Comparative Characteristics of The Physical Fitness Indicators of 11-12-Year-Old Acrobats with The Normative Requirements of The “Salomatlik” Test

Authors

  • Karimov Doniyor Komil o‘g‘li Doctor of philosophy on pedagogical sciences (PhD), International master of sport, Fergana State University, Fergana City, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cejsr.v45i2.465

Keywords:

Health, Young Acrobats, Monitoring, Normative Requirement, Test Trial, Level, Special Physical, Complex-Coordination, Puberty, Speed-Strength

Abstract

The researcher examines physical fitness levels of 11-12-year-old pair-group sports acrobatics athletes through assessment of their performance against Uzbekistan's “Salomatlik” test standards. Current research about the physical and technical preparation of young acrobats has received limited attention in spite of increasing recognition for training quality improvements. This research uses pedagogical observation practice alongside tests and experiments with statistical approaches to assess speed-strength along with endurance agility flexibility and complete motor readiness of athletes. The study demonstrates that the majority of young acrobats achieve minimum scores equivalent to Levels I and II in their physical attributes but show inconsistent results when measuring their endurance level and their power output in their lower body. The data shows that out of the 12-year-olds who took the 1500-meter run test 34.2% passed Level I standards and a similar percentage of 11-year-olds (33.3%) did so. The highest standards of upper-body strength and flexibility tests were achieved by most young gymnasts but pull-ups and flexibility tests demonstrated universal adoption. The collected data showed that both physical and technical readiness among these age ranges stands at a “good” level but exhibits differences based on fitness aspects as well as chronological age. Sports educators together with coaches should follow these findings to develop training methods that target different age groups while recognizing the natural development sequence of athletes. The completed studies prove that modified specialized sport training should target better performance outcomes alongside protective measures for child athletes’ physical health and developmental stages.

References

[1] I. Vaskan et al., “Comparative analysis of indicators of the morpho-functional condition of the young men aged 15-16 years during the process of physical education,” J. Unkn., 2018.

[2] M. N. Umarov, “Distribution of Informative Indicators in Different Types of Gymnastic All-Around Events,” Fan Sportga, no. 4, pp. 9–12, 2021.

[3] M. S. Tremblay et al., “Global matrix 2.0: report card grades on the physical activity of children and youth comparing 38 countries,” J. Phys. Act. Health, vol. 13, no. s2, pp. S343–S366, 2016.

[4] T. B. Serorez, “The indicators of the physical health of students on the characteristics of the physical fitness, aerobic and anaerobic productivity of their body,” Pedagog. Psychol. Med.-Biol. Probl. Phys. Train. Sports, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 54–59, 2014.

[5] M. D. Schmidt, V. J. Cleland, R. J. Thomson, T. Dwyer, and A. J. Venn, “A comparison of subjective and objective measures of physical activity and fitness in identifying associations with cardiometabolic risk factors,” Ann. Epidemiol., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 378–386, 2008.

[6] President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On Measures to Further Develop Types of Gymnastics.” 2022.

[7] V. Leso et al., “Association between health-related physical fitness indicators and working ability: a systematic review,” J. Occup. Health, vol. 66, no. 1, p. uiad006, 2024.

[8] R. Kostić, S. Uzunović, S. Pantelić, and R. Đurašković, “A comparative analysis of the indicators of the functional fitness of the elderly,” Facta Univ. Ser. Phys. Educ. Sport, vol. 9, no. 2, 2011.

[9] Sh. Khankeldiev and D. Karimov, “Studying the Cumulative Effectiveness of the Methodology for Technical-Movement Training of Young Acrobats,” Ferg. State Univ., vol. 29, no. 3, p. 55, 2023.

[10] D. K. Karimov, “The Interrelation of Body Types of Young Acrobats with Their Sports Specialization,” Inter Educ. Glob. Study, no. 7, pp. 368–375, 2024.

[11] D. K. Karimov, “Methodological Features of Special Movement Training at the Initial Stage of Sports Specialization for Young Acrobats,” PhD Dissertation in Pedagogical Sciences, Tashkent, 2024.

[12] D. K. Karimov, “Comparative Analysis of Motor Preparedness Indicators of Young Acrobats with the Norms of the ‘Salomatlik’ Health Tests,” in Republican Scientific-Practical Conference on Science and Innovation, Tashkent, 2023, pp. 81–83.

[13] D. Karimov, “Studying the Effectiveness of Flexibility Development Methods in Physical Education Students,” Ferg. State Univ., no. 1, p. 10, 2024.

[14] A. N. Gerasevich et al., “Comparative characteristics of the separate morphological and functional state indicators of the organism of modern students (Part 1),” Phys. Educ. Stud., no. 5, pp. 25–32, 2013.

[15] Y. Galan, O. Andrieieva, and O. Yarmak, “The relationship between the indicators of morpho-functional state, physical development, physical fitness and health level of girls aged 12-13 years,” J. Unkn., 2019.

[16] A. K. Eshtayev and M. N. Umarov, “Development of Motor Qualities in Highly Qualified Young Gymnasts,” Fan Sportga, no. 1, pp. 10–13, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-26

How to Cite

o‘g‘li, K. D. K. (2025). Comparative Characteristics of The Physical Fitness Indicators of 11-12-Year-Old Acrobats with The Normative Requirements of The “Salomatlik” Test. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 45(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.51699/cejsr.v45i2.465

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.