Problematic Issues of Accounting for Biological Assets According to International and National Standards

Authors

  • Axmadaliyeva Zebo Abduxalimovna Fergana polytechnic institute, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/economics.v38i1.419

Keywords:

Biological Asset, Biological Transformation, Agricultural Yield, Collection Process, Cost of Sales, Book Value, Fair Value, Government Grants

Abstract

Growing economic globalization demands standardized financial reporting which proves especially crucial for the agricultural sector. Companies reporting their finances according to IFRS standards experience better transparency which attracts international capital investment and leads to economic growth. The Uzbek government considers IFRS transition strategic because they support their efforts to implement national policies which establish international accounting compliance. Financial reporting of biological assets comes with specific drawbacks from their natural shifting characteristics and complex valuation processes. Existing research has failed to detail proper methods and organizational procedures when accounting for biological assets during Uzbekistan's implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards. The integration of national standards with international standards requires better comprehensive framework development. This research analyzes the fundamental issues in applying biological asset accounting procedures under international standards besides national requirements by identifying assessment and categorization problems to provide solutions for improved reporting quality. This research reveals multiple identification problems with biological assets alongside difficulties with accurate fair value assessment and inadequate external data availability. A modified accounting standard specifically designed for Uzbekistan’s agriculture sector should be developed by the financial authorities. This research initiates a comprehensive methodology to merge national accounting standards with IFRS 41 specifications about agriculture industries. The implementation of these recommended changes would lead to better financial transparency which will support foreign investments while producing higher economic efficiency through optimal biological assets.

References

Based on the research conducted on the accounting of biological assets, the following conclusions have been drawn:

In the national accounting system, the valuation of fixed assets related to agricultural activities is carried out in accordance with NAS No. 5 "Fixed Assets" under the generally established procedure.

In accounting legislation and national standards, the concept of biological assets is interpreted differently. In particular, NAS No. 21 (Guidelines for Applying the Chart of Accounts for the Financial and Economic Activities of Business Entities, Section 1, Clause 2) defines them under the accounts "Working and productive animals," "Perennial plants," and "Animals being raised and fattened."

However, annual crops (such as cotton, wheat, etc.), which are part of agricultural production, are not included in this classification.

Recommendations

We believe that for enterprises engaged in agricultural activities in our country, it is necessary to develop a modified accounting standard based on NAS No. 41 "Agriculture."

This new standard could be called "Accounting for Biological Assets" or a similar designation, ensuring proper classification and financial reporting of biological assets in the agricultural sector. Therefore, the shift to evaluating biological assets and agricultural products at their fair value entails substantial alterations in the accounting framework for this sector. This approach allows for a more precise determination of the outcomes of agricultural operations, a reliable and transparent representation of these results in financial statements, and the facilitation of informed decision-making processes.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-05

How to Cite

Abduxalimovna, A. Z. (2025). Problematic Issues of Accounting for Biological Assets According to International and National Standards. Academic Journal of Digital Economics and Stability, 38(1), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.51699/economics.v38i1.419

Issue

Section

Articles