Pregnancy Outcome in Women with Previous One Caesarean Section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijhsms.v3i5.147Keywords:
VBAC, Trial of scar, Elective cesarean section, Maternal outcomes, Vaginal deliveryAbstract
Women with a history of cesarean sections represent a high-risk obstetric group, raising concerns about maternal and neonatal outcomes. The practice of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) has evolved, requiring further investigation into its impact on pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to assess pregnancy outcomes in women with a single prior cesarean section, focusing on vaginal delivery rates and maternal complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted at Albatool Teaching Hospital, Iraq, reviewing the medical records of 90 women who delivered between August and December 2022. Among 36 women considered for trial of scar (TOS), 19 (21.1%) achieved successful vaginal delivery, while 17 (18.9%) required repeat cesarean sections. The results showed that women with previous vaginal deliveries, particularly those with a history of successful VBAC, had higher success rates in vaginal delivery. Careful patient selection and vigilant monitoring are essential for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes in this high-risk population. The findings highlight the need for judicious candidate selection for TOS to optimize pregnancy outcomes.
References
K. Hugill, I. Kemp, and C. Kingdon, "Fathers' Presence at Caesarean Section with General Anaesthetic: Evidence and Debate," The Practising Midwife, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 19–22, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.pmj.2015.02.002.
A. Molina-Sosa, H. Galvan-Espinosa, J. Gabriel-Guzman, and R. F. Valle, "Self-Inflicted Cesarean Section with Maternal and Fetal Survival," International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 287–290, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.11.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.08.018
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, "ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 115: Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery," Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 116, no. 2 Pt 1, pp. 450–463, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e0f5d0.
D. Danon, R. Sekar, K. E. Hack, and N. M. Fisk, "Increased Stillbirth in Uncomplicated Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1318–1326, 2013, doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828c5e1c. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318292766b
M. Murata et al., "Perinatal Outcome and Clinical Features of Monochorionic Monoamniotic Twin Gestation," Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 922–925, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01824.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12014
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, "ACOG Committee Opinion No. 559: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request," Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 904–907, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000428601.05810.8e.
Committee Opinion No. 559, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 904–907, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000428601.05810.8e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000428647.67925.d3
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, "ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 115: Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery," Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 116, no. 2 Pt 1, pp. 450–463, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e0f5d0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251
M. Stark, "Technique of Cesarean Section: Misgav Ladach Method," in Women's Health Today: Perspectives on Current Research and Clinical Practice. Proceedings of the XIV World Congress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, D. R. Popkin and L. J. Peddle, Eds., New York: Parthenon Publishing Group, pp. 81-85, 1994.
I. Hudić et al., "The Misgav-Ladach Method of Cesarean Section: A Step Forward in Operative Technique in Obstetrics," Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 286, no. 5, pp. 1141–1146, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2297-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2448-6
M. Stark, Y. Chavkin, C. Kupfersztain, P. Guedj, and A. R. Finkel, "Evaluation of Combinations of Procedures in Cesarean Section," International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 273–276, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)00037-H. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(94)02306-J
J. L. Hawkins, L. M. Koonin, S. K. Palmer, and C. P. Gibbs, "Anesthesia-Related Deaths During Obstetric Delivery in the United States, 1979–1990," Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 277–284, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00265-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199702000-00002
B. A. Bucklin, J. L. Hawkins, J. R. Anderson, and F. A. Ullrich, "Obstetric Anesthesia Workforce Survey: Twenty-Year Update," Anesthesiology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 645–653, 2005, doi: 10.1097/01.Anesth.0000170662.98194.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030
A. D. Mackeen, R. E. Packard, E. Ota, V. Berghella, and J. K. Baxter, "Timing of Intravenous Prophylactic Antibiotics for Preventing Postpartum Infectious Morbidity in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery," The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 12, p. CD009516, 2014, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009516.pub2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009516.pub2
S. Lurie, "The Changing Motives of Cesarean Section: From the Ancient World to the Twenty-First Century," Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 271, no. 4, pp. 281–285, 2005, doi: 10.1007/s00404-004-0704-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0724-4
A. Szabó and I. Brockington, "Auto-Caesarean Section: A Review of 22 Cases," Archives of Women's Mental Health, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 79–83, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00737-013-0371-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-013-0398-z
U. Högberg, E. Iregren, and C. H. Siven, "Maternal Deaths in Medieval Sweden: An Osteological and Life Table Analysis," Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 19, pp. 495–503, 1987, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.1987.tb02448.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000017120
J. Henry, "Doctors and Healers: Popular Culture and the Medical Profession," in Science, Culture, and Popular Belief in Renaissance Europe, S. Pumphrey, P. L. Rossi, and M. Slawinski, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 197, 1991, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620513.
A. Pařízek, V. Drška, and M. Říhová, "Prague 1337, The First Successful Caesarean Section in Which Both Mother and Child Survived May Have Occurred in the Court of John of Luxembourg, King of Bohemia," Česká Gynekologie, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 321–330, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ceskagyn.2016.07.005.
R. Torpin and I. Vafaie, "The Birth of Rustam: An Early Account of Cesarean Section in Iran," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 81, pp. 185–189, 1961, doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)14493-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)36323-2
JCDR, "Original Article," Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 99–102, 2014, doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7774.4019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/7774.4019
A. Hassan, "Trial of Scar and Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section," Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 2005.
