Gender Differences in Spatial Densely and Attraction Among Students in Port Harcourt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijise.v4i2.547Keywords:
Gender differences, spatial density, attraction, social role theory, Nigerian tertiary educationAbstract
This study examines gender differences in spatial density and attraction among students in tertiary institutions in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, using social role theory as the conceptual framework. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was administered to 60 students sampled purposively from three universities: University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, and Ignatius Ajuru University of Education. The survey included validated Likert-scale instruments measuring perceptions of spatial density and attraction experiences. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed that female students reported significantly higher sensitivity to spatial crowding and congestion than male students (see Table 2). Male students, on the other hand, showed a stronger inclination towards forming relationships with the opposite gender and displayed greater comfort initiating interactions (see Table 3). These findings underscore the influence of gender on students’ spatial cognition and social behavior within academic environments. The study argues for a gender-sensitive approach in the spatial planning of educational institutions to foster inclusivity and improve student experiences. Recommendations include campus design optimization, awareness programs, and initiatives promoting gender-balanced social interactions. This research fills a critical gap in the literature by contextualizing gender-based spatial perceptions within Nigerian higher education and offers actionable insights for educators and policymakers.
References
[1] A. H. Eagly and W. Wood, ‘Social role theory’, in Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins, Eds., Sage Publications Ltd., 2012, pp. 458–476.
[2] D. F. Halpern, J. Wai, and A. Saw, ‘Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evidence from the WAIS-III and other tests’, Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 343–364, 2007.
[3] J. P. Valla and S. J. Ceci, ‘The spatial gender gap in the US: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis’, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 128–154, 2011.
[4] Y. Li, K. Feng, Y. Liu, S. Zhang, J. Liu, and X. You, ‘Gender Differences in Large-Scale and Small-Scale Spatial Ability: A Systematic Review Based on Behavioral and Neuroimaging Research’, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 13, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128.
[5] O. A. Ogunleye, O. O. Agbatogun, and S. O. Agunbiade, ‘Gender differences in spatial cognition among undergraduate students in Nigeria’, Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 163–169, 2017.
[6] C. E. Theophilus, B. Nsereka, and N. Nwankpa, ‘Combating LGBTQ+ IA Lifestyle Choices Using Relgiocentric Communication Approaches in Port Harcourt, Nigeria’, International Journal of Sub-Saharan African Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 556–575, 2025.
[7] G. Adekola, ‘The impact of instructional media on the education of youths on HIV/AIDS in Nigeria urban communities’, International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2010.
[8] M. C. Linn and A. C. Petersen, ‘Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis’, Child Development, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1479–1498, 1985.
[9] M. Bah et al., ‘Changing rural–urban linkages in Mali, Nigeria and Tanzania’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 13–24, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1177/095624780301500104.
[10] S. Johansen and K. Juselius, ‘Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-With Applications to the Demand for Money’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 169–210, 1990.
[11] K. U. Ihemere, ‘A tri-generational study of language choice and language shift in Port Harcourt City Nigeria’, PhD Thesis, Newcastle University, 2006. Accessed: May 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/240
[12] R. A. Lippa, Gender, nature, and nurture. Routledge, 2005. Accessed: May 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781410612946/gender-nature-nurture-richard-lippa
[13] O. Onyokoko, O. Okpako, and B. Onuoha, ‘Strategic management and workplace diversity of selected banks in Port Harcourt, Nigeria’, International Journal of Management Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 22–41, 2019.
[14] S. Asamoah and E. Oduro-Ofori, ‘An assessment of the utilization of open spaces on university campuses: a case study of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana’, SN Soc Sci, vol. 4, no. 12, p. 218, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43545-024-01011-7.
[15] R. O. Popoola, ‘Nigerian Universities’ Sexual Harassment Policies: Palliative or Provocative?’, Journal of African Cultural Studies, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 254–267, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13696815.2023.2237922.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Victor Briggs , Ihuoma Nnennaya Uro, Iyagba P. W

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.