Text as a Cognitive Structure

Authors

  • Pirnazarova Dilbarxon 1. PhD Candidate in Uzbek Language Specialization, Kokhand State Institute of Pedagogy

Keywords:

text, representative analysis, cohesion, implication, mental models and frames, intertextuality, conceptual metaphor

Abstract

The present work is devoted to the consideration of texts as cognitive systems in Uzbek linguistics and discusses their semantic and structural properties as well as cultural connotations. Over the past half a century, there has been substantial development in text linguistics, the coordination of cognitive, pragmatic, and cultural approaches in text analysis is still in its infancy. This paper fills this gap by analyzing texts as representing mental models and connotations, and as invoking specific semiotic connections and intertexts. The research applies the regime of representative analysis to study how texts function as replicas of reality integrating cognitive schemas, mental frames, and cultural signs. Analytically, the study employs methodological theories from cognitive linguistics and text pragmatics to discover the semantic coherence, presuppositions, and conceptual metaphors in texts. As the outcome of the analyses, texts are shown to be not less cohesive, containing both local and long-distance semantic bonds affected by anaphora, deixis, and ellipsis. In addition, texts contain cultural and philosophical semiotics, they interconnect intertextually and favour the creation of conceptual metaphors. The study focuses on cognitive activities that occur while constructing/interpreting the text through mental models to understand the text input. I believe that the findings of this research can be applied to cognitive linguistics, post-cultural studies, and language acquisition: while offering a way to look at texts as cognitive, plastic texts. This particular point of view improves the comprehension of how aspects of language can express rich meanings, and language and cognition are related.

References

Abdurahmonova R. The Function of Deictic Units in Text Formation in Different Systemic Languages. PhD dissertation in Philology. Fergana, 2021. – P. 89.

Dymarsky M.Ya. Problems of Text Formation and Literary Text: Based on the Material of Russian Prose of the 19th-20th Centuries. Moscow: URSS, 2001. – P. 36.

Belousov K.I. Synergetics of Text: From Structure to Form. Moscow: Book House "LIBRICOM", 2008. – P. 12.

Theory of Literature. 2 volumes. Volume 1. Literary Work. Tashkent: Fan, 1978. – P. 312.

Lotman Yu.M. On Art. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2000. – P. 62.

Boymirzaeva S. Categories Forming the Communicative-Pragmatic Content of the Text in the Uzbek Language. PhD dissertation in Philology. Tashkent, 2010. – P. 18.

See: Safarov Sh. Pragmalinguistics. Tashkent: Uzbekistan National Encyclopedia, 2008. – P. 153.

See: Vinogradov V.V. Some Tasks in the Study of Syntax of Simple Sentences // Questions of Linguistics. 1954. No. 1. – P. 3-12; Ordynskaya S.N. Linguistic Compression: Its Ontology, Essence, and Functions // III International Boduén Readings: I.A. Boduén de Kurtene and Contemporary Problems of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Kazan, 2006. – P. 67-78; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/suschnost-rol-i-funktsii-ellipsisa-v-yazyke-na-materiale-raznostrukturnyh-yazykov/viewer.

See: Mahmudov N. Presupposition and Sentence // Uzbek Language and Literature. 1986. No. 6. – P. 28-32; Nurmonov A. Presupposition in Auxiliary Constructions // Uzbek Language and Literature. 1986. No. 6. – P. 42-45.

Hakimov M. Foundations of Uzbek Pragmalinguistics. Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2013. – P. 93.

Gaziyeva M. Implicative-Pragmatic Features of Literary Text. Fergana, 2023. – P. 143.

See: Alifierenko N. Controversial Issues in Semantics. Moscow: Gnosis, 2005; Maslova V.A. Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Moscow: Filinta, 2006; Safarov Sh. Cognitive Linguistics. Jizzakh: Sanzhor, 2006. – P. 65.

Safarov Sh. Cognitive Linguistics. Jizzakh: Sanzhor, 2006. – P. 35-53.

Khudoyberganova D. Anthropocentric Study of Text. Tashkent: Fan, 2013. – P. 51.

Qurunov D., Mamajonov Z., Sheraliyeva M. Dictionary of Literary Studies. Revised edition. Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2013. – P. 119.

Lakoff J., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By (translated by N.V. Pertzov) // Theory of Metaphor. Moscow, 1990. – P. 387-415.

Khudoyberganova D. Anthropocentric Study of Text. Tashkent: Fan, 2013. – P. 49.

Khudoyberganova D. The Work Mentioned Above. – P. 49

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Pirnazarova Dilbarxon. (2025). Text as a Cognitive Structure . International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 62–68. Retrieved from https://journal.academicjournal.id/index.php/ijllal/article/view/315

Issue

Section

Articles