Factors Influencing the Strategic Development of General Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ajsld.v4i1.211Keywords:
General Secondary Schools, Management, Strategy, Internal Factors, External FactorsAbstract
Meeting the educational needs of society is contingent upon effectively organizing the educational process in alignment with both current and future demands within the management of educational institutions. Strategic management plays a crucial role in facilitating the introduction of innovations and implementing necessary changes while considering these factors. This study explores the formulation of a management strategy aimed at the development of educational institutions, taking into account contemporary needs as well as the various factors that influence its execution, including their positive and negative impacts.The strategy for managing general education institutions focuses on addressing identified educational needs. This involves establishing priority directions that enhance the quality of education and implementing necessary changes within the institution aligned with the goals and objectives that foster these directions. Such changes are influenced by various external and internal factors, including students, parents and their representatives, teachers, and the management team. While some stakeholders support these changes, recognizing their significance, others may resist due to the challenges and inconveniences that arise during the transition.
References
Adu, E. O., Akinloye, G. M., & Olaoye, O. F. (2014). Internal and external school supervision: Issues, challenges and wayforward. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890189
Bas, E. (2014). Educar para innovar: La innovacio´n como cultura. Juventud, proactividad, creatividad, participacio´n y visio´n de futuro compartida. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 104, 11–30.
Bell, L. (1999), ‘Back to the Future, the development of education policy in England’, The Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 37, nos. 3 & 4, pp.200 –228.
Bloom, N. et al., 2014. Does Management Matters in Schools. NBER Working Paper Series (20667).
Hu, K., 2023. ChatGPT sets record for fastest growing user base. Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growinguser-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/.
Liang, G. (2024). Sleep health status and its influencing factors among primary and secondary school students in Lanzhou City. Zhongguo Ertong Baojian Zazhi, 32(10), 1070–1075. https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2023-1178
Lu, X. (2024). A cross-sectional survey and analysis of influencing factors on the occurrence of post-burn psychological stress disorder in preschool children. Chinese Journal of Burns and Wounds, 40(4), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230731-00028
Ioana Marin, Andreea Marin-Pantelescu. Educational Management Strategies. “Ovidius” University Annals, Economic Sciences Series Volume XX, Issue 1/ 2020, pp. 726
Lubienski, C., Yemini, M., & Maxwell, C. (2022). The rise of external actors in education: Shifting boundaries globally and locally. Policy Press.
Rikkerink, M., Verbeeten, H., Simons, R. J., & Ritzen, H. (2016). A new model of educational innovation: Exploring the nexus of organizational learning, distributed leadership, and digital technologies. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9253-5
Safstrom, C.A., & Månsson, N. (2022). The marketisation of education and the democratic deficit. European Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904121101
Sammut-Bonnici, T. Strategic Management. 2015, pp. 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272352897.
DOI: 10.1002/9781118785317.weom060194
Schools of the Future Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. Geneva Switzerland, 2020. P. 34., pp-5.
Schilling, Y. (2024). A Qualitative-Content-Analytical Approach to the Quality of Primary Students’ Questions: Testing a Competence Level Model and Exploring Selected Influencing Factors. Education Sciences, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091003
Tann, J. (2021). The change agent in innovation. Prometheus, 37(1), 44–53.
Theodoropoulos, N., & Kiprianos, P. (2020). Teachers and creativity: The role of internal motives. Macrothink Institute. International Journal of Education, 12(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i3.17746
Tuomi, I., 2018. Learning, teaching and the impact of artificial i ntelligence Education. Joint Research Center (JRC), Science and Technology Service of the European Commission, pp. 1-47.
Valde´s Sa´nchez, V., & Guti´errez-Esteban, P. (2018). Las urgencias pedago´gicas en la sociedad del aprendizaje y el conocimiento. Un estudio para la reflexio´n sobre la calidad en el nuevo modelo educativo. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2018.3199
Zhang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2015). The source of innovation in China: Highly innovative systems. Springer.
Шляйхер А. Жаҳон миқёсидаги таълим. XXI аср мактаб тизимини қандай барпо этмоқ керак? / сўз боши Ш.Шерматов, Ҳ.Умарова; Умумий таҳрир Д.Норбоева; таржимонлар: Р.Ахматова, Д.Норбоева. – Тошкент: “Zamin Nashr” nashriyoti, 2022. – 74-б.
