Optimization of Tetrigona apicalis Propolis Extract using Ethanol Solvent with Shaking Ultrasound Assisted Extraction Method

Authors

  • Syahdilla Anggiva Akhni Rarasati Politeknik Negeri Lampung
  • Oktaf Rina Politeknik Negeri Lampung
  • Nurbani Kalsum Politeknik Negeri Lampung
  • Imam Sofi’i Politeknik Negeri Lampung
  • Yatim Rahayu Widodo Politeknik Negeri Lampung
  • Isnina Isnina PT. Suhita Lebah Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/emjms.v26i4.53

Keywords:

propolis extraction., response surface methodology, shaking ultrasound-assisted extraction

Abstract

Indonesia as a country with a tropical climate, is famous for its natural wealth and has various kinds of flora and fauna that can be found and utilized. Several herbal products have antioxidant and antibacterial capabilities, one of which is propolis. Bee propolis is a functional food because of its nutrition and contains high levels of bioactive components that help protect health. Raw propolis from farmers needs to be purified before human consumption because raw propolis still contains beeswax, resin, and other impurities. The method used is shaking ultrasound-assisted extraction (SUAE), which produces perfect extraction, higher yield and active content, and a shorter time. The purpose of this research is analyzed optimum conditions for extracted Tetrigona apicalis propolis using the SUAE method in ethanol solvent. The propolis extraction process is that raw propolis is size reduced, then solvent is added and macerated using shaker. Next, the extract is processed with a sonicator, and the extract is filtered. The solvent used is 70% ethanol, and the results of the propolis extract are processed using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The parameters that were optimized were variations in stirring time of 1-24 hours and ultrasonic process time of 1-20 minutes. The best conditions in the propolis extraction process from the yield response shown were a stirring time of 28.76 minutes and an ultrasonic process time of 23.94 minutes with a yield of 8.735%. Based on statistical analysis using software, stirring time and ultrasonic processing time are factors that have a significant influence on the yield of propolis extract produced. The model used is a quadratic model with R2 0.9452. The yield value of the propolis extract predicted by the software is close to the percent yield value obtained based on experiments carried out with an error value of less than 5%.

References

Z. Bakkaloglu, M. Arici, and S. Karasu, “Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of turkish propolis and characterization of phenolic profile, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity,” Food Sci. Technol., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 687–695, 2021, doi: 10.1590/fst.14520.

N. Pujirahayu, H. Ritonga, L. Satya Agustina, and Z. Uslinawaty, “Antibacterial Activity of Oil Extract of Trigona Propolis,” Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 419–422, 2015.

B. Yucel, E. Topal, and M. Kosoglu, “Bee Products as Functional Food,” Superfood Funct. Food - An Overv. Their Process. Util., 2017, doi: 10.5772/65477.

N. Triandita, K. H. Maifianti, M. I. Rasyid, H. Yuliani, and L. Angraeni, “Pengembangan Produk Pangan Fungsional Dalam Meningkatkan Kesehatan Dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Desa Suak Pandan Aceh Barat,” Logista J. Ilm. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 457–464, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/506764/pengembangan-produk-pangan-fungsional-dalam-meningkatkan-kesehatan-dan-kesejahte

M. H. Ibroham, S. Jamilatun, and I. D. Kumalasari, “A Review: Potensi Tumbuhan-Tumbuhan di Indonesia sebagai Antioksidan Alami,” Semin. Nas. Penelit., pp. 1–13, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/semnaslit

A. A. Ramandani, S. Shintawati, S. P. Aji, and S. Sunarsi, “Pemanfaatan Lignin Serai Wangi Sebagai Lignin Resorsinol Formaldehida (LRF) Menggunakan Ultrasonic Microwave-Assisted Extraction (UMAE),” CHEESA Chem. Eng. Res. Artic., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 40, 2022, doi: 10.25273/cheesa.v5i1.10348.40-48.

K. Pobiega, K. Kraśniewska, D. Derewiaka, and M. Gniewosz, “Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of propolis extracts obtained by means of various extraction methods,” J. Food Sci. Technol., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 5386–5395, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04009-9.

S. Sudibyo, S. Suharto, S. A. A. Rarasati, Y. R. Wulandari, S. Shintawati, and F. S. Rohman, “Optimization of Sodium Bicarbonate Production from Ammonium Hydroxide Using a Froth Flotation Column,” Chem. Eng. Technol., vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.1002/ceat.202200060.

W. Mariana, S. B. Widjanarko, and E. Widyastuti, “Optimasi Formulasi dan Karakterisasi Fisikokimia dalam Pembuatan Daging Restrukturisasi menggunakan Response Surface Methodology (Konsentrasi Jamur Tiram Serta Gel Porang dan Karagenan),” J. Pangan dan Agroindustr, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 83–91, 2017.

L. Shen et al., “A comprehensive review of ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) for bioactive components: Principles, advantages, equipment, and combined technologies,” Ultrason. Sonochem., vol. 101, no. November, pp. 1–24, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106646.

H. Pawignya, T. D. Kusworo, and B. Pramudono, “Optimization for Production Tert-Butyl Glycoside Nonionic Surfactant Using Response Surface Methodology,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1295, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1295/1/012003.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-16

How to Cite

Akhni Rarasati, S. A., Rina, O., Kalsum, N., Sofi’i, I., Widodo, Y. R., & Isnina, I. (2024). Optimization of Tetrigona apicalis Propolis Extract using Ethanol Solvent with Shaking Ultrasound Assisted Extraction Method. European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science, 26(4), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.51699/emjms.v26i4.53

Issue

Section

Articles