Harvesting and Impacting Agro-Ecosystem Services in Agriculture

Authors

  • Nabiyeva Feruza 4th Year Student of the Samarkand branch of Tashkent State University of Economics
  • Xusinova Shodiya 4th Year Student of the Samarkand branch of Tashkent State University of Economics
  • Tayirov Ozodbek Assistant Teacher of Samarkand branch of Tashkent State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/ijbde.v4i1.231

Keywords:

Agroecosystem services (AES), Ecosystem disservices (AEDS), sustainable agricultural development, biodiversity, trade-offs and synergies, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), multi-source data integration, agricultural landscape management, ecosystem service assessment

Abstract

Merits of AES include provisioning, regulating, supporting and cultural services which underpins sustainable agricultural development Goal of this study is to evaluate AES in various contexts. However, to date, understanding of AES remains in its infancy, with many questions regarding AEDS remaining unanswered, little consensus on how best to scale up ecosystem disservices assessment to an operational level, and little attention given to geographical disparities in AES research. In this mixed-methods study, bibliometry, literature synthesis, and cross-source analysis are used to assess global trends, key figures, and methodological approaches in AES research. The overall results show a significant development of AES literature, however, unanswered questions and research implications are identified, in particular, the need for the development of more specific indicators, inclusion of the AES concepts into the holistic theoretical framework, as well as contextualisation of methodologies and approaches. These results highlight the inherent complementarity or trade-offs between AES, and provide information to enhance the understanding of agroecosystem management. The potential applications are vast, informing the realistic pursuit of sustainable agricultural productivity and the conservation of ecosystems and the SDGs for the future development of research for global agroecosystems.

References

Bing, Z., Qiu, Y., Huang, H., Chen, T., Zhong, W., & Jiang, H. (2021). Spatial Distribution of Cultural Ecosystem Ser-vices Demand and Supply in Urban and Suburban Areas: A Case Study From Shanghai, China. Ecological Indi-cators, 127, 107720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107720

Boone, L., Roldán-Ruiz, I., Linden, V. V., Muylle, H., & Dewulf, J. (2019). Environmental Sustainability of Conven-tional and Organic Farming: Accounting for Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment. Science of The Total Environment, 695, 133841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133841

Burel, F., Aviron, S., Baudry, J., Le Féon, V., & Vasseur, C. (2013). The Structure and Dynamics of Agricultural Land-scapes as Drivers of Biodiversity. In B. Fu & K. Jones (Eds.), Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture (pp. 285–308). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_17

Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand and Budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019

Buschiazzo, D. E., Panigatti, J. L., & Unger, P. W. (1998). Tillage Effects on Soil Properties and Crop Production in the Sub-Humid and Semiarid Argentinean Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research, 49(1–2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00150-4

Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Pa-ruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & Belt, M. (1997). The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press.

Karimov, I. V. (2024). Effective Utilization of Investments in Agriculture: A Case Study of Uzbekistan. Journal of Fintech, Business, and Development, 1(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/yyyy

Krimmer, E. (2019). Size, Age, and Surrounding Semi-Natural Habitats Modulate the Effectiveness of Flower-Rich Agri-Environment Schemes to Promote Pollinator Visitation in Crop Fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Envi-ronment, 284, 106590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106590

Liu, W. (2019). Using Bibliometric Analysis to Understand the Recent Progress in Agroecosystem Services Research. Ecological Economics, 156, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.001

Mamayunusovna, P. O. (2023). Poverty Alleviation in the Country Through Entrepreneurship Development. The Journal of Economics, Finance and Innovation, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/yyyy

Mardiyevna, S. G. (2023). Importance of Sustainable Development in the Modern World. The Journal of Economics, Finance and Innovation, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/yyyy

Martínez-Núñez, C. (2019). Interacting Effects of Landscape and Management on Plant–Solitary Bee Networks in Olive Orchards. Functional Ecology, 33(12), 2316–2326. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13465

Martínez-Núñez, C. (2020). Low-Intensity Management Benefits Solitary Bees in Olive Groves. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13511

Tayirov, O., Karimov, I. V., Toshmamatov, A., & Shomirzayev, S. (2024). Rational Use of Water Resources in Agri-culture (In the Case of Uzbekistan). International Journal of Business Diplomacy and Economy, 3(5), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/yyyy

Downloads

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Feruza, N., Shodiya, X., & Ozodbek, T. (2024). Harvesting and Impacting Agro-Ecosystem Services in Agriculture. International Journal of Business Diplomacy and Economy, 4(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.51699/ijbde.v4i1.231

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.