Greater Growth and Yield Response of Nano Urea with Conventional Urea for Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Cultivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijbea.v3i3.69Keywords:
nanotechnology, plant nutrition, nano urea, nutrient use efficiencyAbstract
In today’s world, adopting new technology is essential to sustain future production. Nanotechnology is becoming increasingly popular due to its efficiency in various scientific applications. In agriculture, nanomaterials significantly enhance the effectiveness of fertilizers and pesticides. Nano fertilizers, in particular, require very small quantities and leave negligible residues, making them environmentally friendly. With this in mind, an experimental trial was conducted during the winter (Rabi) season of 2023-2024 at the Department of Soil Science, HSTU, Dinajpur. The trial used a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 7 treatments and three replications, focusing on nano-urea i.e., T1 = Control, T2 =100% RDF, T3 = Only Nano urea (3 sprays), T4 = Nano urea (3 sprays) + rest all (no urea), T5 = 50% urea + Nano urea (3 sprays) + rest all, T6 = No urea + no Nano + rest all and T7 = Only urea, respectively. The results revealed that most of the growth parameter with tuber yield was achieved highest in treatment T5, which involved 50% urea combined with nano-urea (3 sprays) and all other standard practices, followed by treatment T2 with 100% recommended doses of fertilizers (RDF). Nano-urea showed promising results in terms of dry matter percentage, chlorophyll content, % protein, and starch levels. It proved to be economically viable by reducing the use of chemical fertilizers by 50%, controlling nutrient release from the soil, providing crops with precise nutrient amounts, increasing yield, and maintaining environmental safety through improved nutrient use efficiency.
References
Babaeian, M., Piri, I., Tavassoli, A., Esmaeilian, Y., & Gholami, H. (2011). Effect of water stress and micronutrients (Fe, Zn, and Mn) on chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf chlorophyll content, and sunflower nutrient uptake in Sistan region. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(15), 3526-3531.
Chauhan, A., Pallvi, Rattan, P., Ludarmani, & Sharma, A. (2023). Effect of pre-soaking of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers in nano-urea and nano-zinc on its growth, quality, and yield. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(7), 980-995.
Congreves, K. A., Otchere, O., Ferland, D., Farzadfar, S., Williams, S., & Arcand, M. M. (2021). Nitrogen use efficiency definitions of today and tomorrow. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 637108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.637108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.637108
Das, S. K., & Chakraborty, A. (2018). Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to zinc application under lower Gangetic plains of West Bengal. Journal of Crop and Weed, 14(2), 112-116.
DeRosa, M. C., Monreal, C., Schnitzer, M., Walsh, R., & Sultan, Y. (2010). Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nature Nan-otechnology, 5, 91-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.2
Dutta, D., & Bera, A. (2021). Nano fertilizer on sustainable agriculture: A review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 11(8), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i830451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i830451
Kumar, R., Bohra, J. S., Kumawat, N., & Singh, A. K. (2015). Fodder yield, nutrient uptake, and quality of baby corn (Zea mays L.) as influenced by NPKS and Zn fertilization. Research on Crops, 16(2), 243-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2348-7542.2015.00036.4
Lawlor, D. W., Kontturi, M., & Young, A. T. (1989). Photosynthesis by flag leaves of wheat in relation to protein, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and nitrogen supply. Journal of Experimental Botany, 40(1), 43-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/40.1.43
Lenka, B., & Das, S. K. (2019). Effect of boron and zinc application on growth and productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at alluvial soil (Entisols) of India. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 64(1), 129-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i1.5245
Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Rinderle, U. (1988). The role of chlorophyll fluorescence in the detection of stress conditions in plants. CRC Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 19(1), 29-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15476510.1988.10401466
Manikanta, B., Channakeshava, S., Bhausaheb Tambat, B. M., & Gayathri, B. (2023). Effect of nano-nitrogen, copper, and zinc liquid fertilizers on growth, yield, and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal, 2(4), 2590-2596.
Mejías, J. H., Salazar, F. J., Pérez, L., Hube, S., Rodriguez, M., & Alfaro, M. A. (2021). Nano fertilizers: A cutting-edge approach to increase nitrogen use efficiency in grasslands. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.635114
Midde, S. K., Perumal, M. S., Murugan, G., Sudhagar, R., Mattepally, V. S., & Bada, M. R. (2022). Evaluation of nano urea on growth and yield attributes of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chemical Science Review and Letters, 11(42), 211-214.
Mu, T. H., Tan, S. S., & Xue, Y. L. (2009). The amino acid composition, solubility, and emulsifying properties of sweet potato protein. Food Chemistry, 112(4), 1002-1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.012
Nityamanjari, M. (2018). Effect of fertilizers on growth and productivity of potato: A review. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10, 5183-5186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-3710.10.4.5183-5186
Prasad, R., Pathak, H., Patra, A. K., & Shivay, Y. S. (2014). Nitrogen management. In Textbook of Plant Nutrient Man-agement (pp. 73-92).
Qureshi, A., Singh, D. K., & Dwivedi, S. (2018). Nano-fertilizers: A novel way for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 7(2), 3325-3335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.398
Rahman, M. H., Azad, M. O. K., Islam, J., Rana, M. S., Li, K. H., & Lim, Y. S. (2021). Production of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) seed tuber under artificial led light irradiation in plant factory. Plants, 10(2), 297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020297
Raliya, R., Saharan, V., Dimkpa, C., & Biswas, P. (2017). Nano fertilizer for precision and sustainable agriculture: Current state and future perspectives. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 66, 6487-6503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02178
Rameshaiah, G. N., & Jpallavi. (2015). Nano fertilizers and nano sensors: An attempt for developing smart agriculture. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(1), 314-320.
Tiwari, K. N., Yogendra Kumar, Nayak, R. K., Abhimanyu Rai, Jashvir Singh, Singh, S. P., & Anand Srivastava. (2021). Nano-urea for enhancing yield and farmers profit with potato in Uttar Pradesh. Annals of Plant and Soil Research, 23(4), 495-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2021.10109
Trehan, S. P., & Singh, B. P. (2013). Nutrient efficiency of different crop species and potato varieties: In retrospect and prospect. Potato Journal, 40, 1-21.
Valojai, S. T. S., Niknejad, Y., Amoli, H. F., & Tari, D. B. (2021). Response of rice yield and quality of nano-fertilizers in comparison with conventional fertilizers. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(13), 1971-1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1884701
Vijayakumar, S., Lokesh, G. D., Hareesh Reddy, C. H., Mahender Kumar, R., & Sundaram, R. M. (2022). Efficient ni-trogen management technologies for sustainable rice production. Journal of Rice Research, 15(2), 1-19.
Yogananda, S. B., & Sowmyalatha, B. S. (2024). Comparative evaluation of nano urea and urea foliar sprays on nutrient uptake and soil fertility in fodder maize (Zea mays L.) production. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 30(5), 939-946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i52011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Md. Rayhanul Hoque, Shahadat Hossain Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
