Analysis of Pragmatic Terms in Western Political Discourse Intended to Convey a Message to Iraq: US Ambassador's Speech as a Case Study

Authors

  • Mohammed Hayder Mohammed Dept. of English, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq
  • Mohammed Abbas Mahdi Dept. of English, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/ijllal.v4i1.402

Keywords:

Pragmatic Terms, Political Discourse, Conveying Certain Messages

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the pragmatic terms used in the U.S. ambassador's speech to identify how these items function to convey particular messages and to assess their impact on shaping Iraqi perceptions of U.S. policies and intentions. Its importance rests in the fact that it can demystify how pragmatic terms mold political communication in the specific framework of Western discourse oriented toward Iraq. Since the fine-grained use of language is being focused on, it can reveal underlying goals and plans that can change public opinions and political results. This study includes some theoretical studies and comments regarding the topic of analysis of pragmatic terms in Western political discourse intended to convey a message for Iraq. This study is qualitative. It analyzes U.S. Ambassador Alina Romanowski's speech about the proposed amendments to Iraq's Personal Status Law. It uses thematic analysis as a method for analyzing qualitative information that includes reading through a set of data and trying to find patterns within the meaning of the information to discover topics. Austin's and Searle's Speech Act Theory is applied to this study. The results clarified the fact of the Eastern pragmatic terms and their functions in conveying certain messages to Iraqi people.

References

J. Wilson, "Political discourse," The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 775-794, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch36

T. A. Van Dijk, "What is political discourse analysis," Belgian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11-52, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij

U. Okulska and P. Cap, "Analysis of political discourse," Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3-20, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.36.03oku

J. Pan, "The pragmatics of political discourse: An analytical framework and a comparative study of policy speeches in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong," Bandung, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 252-284, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/21983534-00602006

S. C. Levinson, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313

B. Drămnescu, "Pragmatic approaches in the analysis of the political discourse," Philosophy, Communication, Media Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 45-51, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22618/TP.PCMS.20164.349005

A. Fetzer and E. Weizman, "Political discourse as mediated and public discourse," Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 143-153, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.014

A. Chadwick, "Studying political ideas: A public political discourse approach," Political Studies, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 283-301, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00260

T. A. Van Dijk, "Political discourse and political cognition," Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, pp. 203-237, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij

A. Dylgjeri, "The function and importance of discourse markers in political discourse," 2014.

J. L. B. Arroyo, "Pragmatics of political discourse," The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-7, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1464

J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch, Eds., Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, vol. 10, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1

V. Ozyumenko and T. Larina, "How to understand a media text in the language classroom: ambiguity as a strategy of manipulation?" in EDULEARN18 Proceedings, pp. 1626-1633, IATED, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.0487

E. P. N. Saputro, "The analysis of illocutionary acts of Jokowi’s speeches," Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University, 2015.

K. Aijmer and A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, "Pragmatic markers," Discursive Pragmatics, vol. 8, pp. 223-247, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.13aij

F. Bargiela-Chiappini, "Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts)," Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 35, no. 10-11, pp. 1453-1469, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X

P. Hanks, "Types of speech acts," in New Work on Speech Acts, pp. 123-143, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0005

C. Kock, "Arguing for Different Types of Speech Acts," 2009.

T. A. Van Dijk, "War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicates and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq," Journal of Language and Politics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65-91, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij

K. T. Nassar, "How ISIS addresses women from Western and Middle-Eastern backgrounds: A discourse analysis," 2019.

R. Biria and A. Mohammadi, "The socio pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach," Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1290-1302, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013

S. G. Obeng, "Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse," Discourse & Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49-83, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008001004

M. T. Bataineh, "Linguistic and pragmatic devices in king Abdullah’s speech: A political discourse analysis," International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 40-44, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.2p.40

A. Romanowski, "US expresses concern over proposed amendments to Iraq's Personal Status Law," Shafaq News, 2024, 21:33.

A. Moser and I. Korstjens, "Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction," European Journal of General Practice, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 271-273, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093

S. T. Riger and R. A. Sigurvinsdottir, "Thematic analysis," in Handbook of Methodological Approaches to Community-Based Research: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods, pp. 33-41, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780190243654.003.0004

V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning," The Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 120-123, 2013.

R. Barrow, "Language: Definition and metaphor," Studies in Philosophy and Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 113-124, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004951021638

H. H. Kadhim Al-Shammari and M. M. K. Al-Ibrahimi, "The effective law that the people are required to amend and that is contrary to Islamic law: Iraqi Personal Status," Ahl al-Bayt Magazine, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 377-394, 1959.

F. H. Van Eemeren and B. Garssen, "Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse," Controversy and Confrontation, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6

L. Rheault, "Expressions of anxiety in political texts," in Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, pp. 92-101, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-5612

Downloads

Published

2025-02-15

How to Cite

Mohammed, M. H., & Mahdi, M. A. (2025). Analysis of Pragmatic Terms in Western Political Discourse Intended to Convey a Message to Iraq: US Ambassador’s Speech as a Case Study. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.51699/ijllal.v4i1.402

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.